Recently, Dan Hsu has been posting articles examining all of the behind-the-scenes details of game journalism on his blog. About a month ago, he asked for readers to submit their opinions on the subject. After the deadline, he selected a few to post on his blog. Since I'm interested in doing game journalism, I figured I'd submit an article. Unfortunately, my article was not one of the few chosen to be published on Dan's blog. But, everything is a learning experience, and since I've started my own gaming blog in the intervening time, I decided to post my article here so I can get some feedback on what works and what doesn't.
For proper context you might want to read Dan's articles first:
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
Part Five
Article submission announcement
And here's the article I submitted (AGAIN! FEEDBACK IS MUCH APPRECIATED!):
October 5, 2008
Game magazines have always been present in my life, even when I was young. Often, I would sit down with a copy of Nintendo Power or EGM and absorb every detail in that month's issue. As I read, I thought of how cool it must be to be a game journalist. You spend all day playing video games and then write about them! How could that not be a cool job? Of course, as I got older, I realized such thoughts were naive. There's much more responsibility required of the job than I previously thought.
As a reader, I feel the most important responsibility of a game journalist is to write for their audience. There must be a strong bond between the writer and the reader. The writer ignores any outside persuasions and biases, providing the reader with an article as honestly written as possible. The minute a writer makes an article for a game company, or in order to reach some weekly article quota as instructed by their employer, the journalist loses a portion of their integrity and the quality of their writing suffers.
I understand the role of PR events and press conferences. They're a way to get the press, and the public informed and excited about new games, and they're simply a part of the game journalist job description. There is nothing wrong with attending these events as long as the main focus is the game or something that compliments one's understanding of a game. I agree with Shoe that there may be some merit in being treated to a UFC match if you're reviewing a UFC game. Living the experience can help a writer judge how accurate or realistic the atmosphere of the game is.
However, there are a few problems with this corporate relationship. One problem is the events where the main focus is not about the games, but rather throwing lavish parties for the press in hopes of swaying their opinion. Treating clients and business partners to fancy dinners or a night with a female companion are just cultural methods of doing business. The problem is that even if the journalist knows the old song and dance, there's still a possibility that these events will compromise the integrity of that person's article. It might convince a writer to be a little more lenient on that company's game, or even worse, make them believe that if they write a harsh review, the company will use their free dinner or swag as leverage against the writer or the company they work for. In the latter case, it would be comforting to know that your supervisors would support your opinion. Yet, they may not support your article at all, especially if the game company threatens to pull their advertising over a bad review.
Journalists are not innocent in this relationship either. In order to maintain an unbiased opinion, journalists must take caution in what gifts they accept and what requests they make. Making outlandish demands of a company's PR group is not only unprofessional, but also brings a journalist's moral values into question. It feels a bit like a black market trade. If the company gives them free tickets to a baseball game, or a five star meal, or washes all their clothes for them, then the journalist will write a more favorable review of their game. Therefore, the journalist is no longer writing for their audience, but for their own personal gain instead.
The main thing a reader wants is honesty. As long as the writer provides a fair and truthful opinion about a game, the reader will be content. Shoe's advice on dealing with PR groups is great. It's okay if the writer partakes in a free game or a fancy event every now and then. If they're straightforward and honest with readers, then the readers will be respectful to the journalist. That being said, working for a company that appreciates your honesty doesn't hurt
either. Even if a person gets fired for reasons irrelevant to a score they gave a game, if the company isn't honest about what happened, readers will assume the worst. This is why game journalism must maintain a strong and truthful relationship with its most important subjects: the readers.
Written by Colin "Satchamobob" Wheelock
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Posts
Posts
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Sites We Like
- 1up.com
- Edge Magazine
- Eurogamer
- First-Person Shouter - Perspectives on PC Gaming
- Gamasutra - The Art of Business of Making Games
- Game Politics - Where Politics and Video Games Collide
- Gamespy
- Grand Text Auto - A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.
- Joysitq.com
- Quarter to Three
- Rock, Paper, Shotgun
6 comments:
You discuss why it is important for a game journalist to not be bought out by the companies, but you do not defend why a game journalist should write for gamers themselves. Why do gamers deserve someone to pander to them? Also, you say things like a game journalist should not give into pressures by their supervisors, but a journalist should be good enough that they can make deadlines without compromising their work. That is also a part of the job description. The arguments rough with the article lacking either a strict analytical nor bombastic rhetoric perspective which would both give the work persuasive credence. Instead, your article comes off as a little rambling and lacking in a bit of pizazz. I think it is missing a really good editing process to make it really shine. Colin, I know you can do better than this.
I'll admit that I wrote this and then waited until the last minute to get someone to peer edit this for me (mostly because I was swamped with work and didn't have time to think about it).
As for my argument about employee regulated schedules, I was not trying to imply that you can't be a great writer if you follow deadlines. I was suggesting that if an article a person writes is written strictly to fulfill some contractual obligation (I.E. the person writes it because he has to, and does not get any personal enjoyment or satisfaction out of it), then the overall quality of the piece will suffer because of the writer's lack of enthusiasm for it. I should have made this point more clear in the article.
Also, what would you suggest I do to add some more "pizazz?"
For adding pizazz, the article needs to be persuasive. In order to be persuasive it has to either appeal to our intellect giving a logical argument or appeal to our emotions inflaming us with anger or love. Either tactic is perfectly reasonable and achieves your ends. There are representations of this is all forms of game journalism. Though I would say that logic usually is the form favored in magazine reviews where as emotional is favored online.
Secondly remember that when you post something, you should not alienate readers by forcing them to be too much in the know. The key to begin a great game journalist is to make the casual gamer feel welcome and the hardcore gamer feel superior. I fear I might have missed out on the full depth of your article because I did not have time to read the 5 other articles you posted. I know that this is your practice blog, but part of becoming a profession is taking on the identity of that profession. Often that step can catapult your level of thinking and learning in the field.
There's nothing I can really do about the amount of related articles. My commentary was a response to the five articles Shoe posted, so of course having some general idea of what those articles discuss is beneficial to understanding the whole argument. Would you rather I not post anything if someone has to actually get involved with the argument before reading a related opinion?
No, just make sure that you sum up the articles very briefly for your audience. This is going to sound smug, but I'll say it anyway for clarity's sake. An example of what I would want is http://papyrusnews.com/2008/11/04/the-three-rs/ . Like I said I feel weird posting a link to my own blog, but it illustrates my point. When citing another blog post, it is best to give a good summary where the information is easily integrated. You want to avoid sending your readers elsewhere or alienating those too lazy to leave your blog.
How briefly is very briefly then? At the beginning of the post I mentioned the overall theme of the articles my submission was in reference to. Was that perhaps too brief? If that's the case then there must be a fine line between giving the reader too much info and not enough. I see where you are coming from, and I am definitely going to keep that in mind the next time I write something. However, there are other writers out there that give readers additional information on a subject they're discussing. Case in point: http://www.penny-arcade.com/2008/11/3/
And yes, you could've found a better source other than your own blog.
Post a Comment